Opinions
20 March 2026
Do the JRC’s scenarios reflect what the textile industry can actually implement?
Opinions
20 March 2026
Ecosystem's readiness to support EU strategic autonomy and defence efforts
Infrastructure
Investments and funding
+17 more
Login / create an account to be able to react
-
11
The publication of the Joint Research Centre’s third milestone, of a roadmap of four, in the preparatory study for the implementation of the delegated acts of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) marks a decisive moment in the EU’s path toward regulating the environmental performance of textile products. This milestone represents the technical backbone on which the EU will build the future ESPR delegated act for textile and apparel.
Blumine
Topics
Albania
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
EU-27
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kosovo
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Moldova
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Türkiye
Ukraine
Other
Academic / Research and VET Institutions
Business Support Organisation
Company with 250 or more employees
Cluster Organisations
Consumer Organisations
Cultural and Heritage Organisations
Destination Management & Marketing Organisations
EU Institutions
Financial Institutions and Investors
Industry Associations and Chambers of Commerce
International Organisations
Local Authorities
Media / Journalist Organisations
National authorities
Networks and Federations / Confederations
NGOs / Non-profits
Notified Bodies
Regional Authorities
SMEs (a company with less than 250 employees)
Social Economy Entity
Trade Unions
Other
-
Transition Pathway's building blocks
-
-
Ecosystem's readiness to support EU strategic autonomy and defence efforts
-
Infrastructure
-
Investments and funding
-
R&I, techniques and technological solutions
-
Skills
-
Social dimension
-
Sustainable competitiveness
-
Regulation and public governance
-
-
Industrial ecosystems
-
-
Textile
-
-
Textiles ecosystem areas
-
-
Fibres, yarns and fabrics
-
Apparel and clothing accessories
-
Household/interior textiles
-
Technical textiles
-
Leather and fur
-
Footwear
-
Research and Innovation
-
Technology and Machinery
-
Waste management, reuse and repair
-
Business support and Communication
-
Not area specific (interested in more than one of the above)
-
Share
While the JRC’s third milestone report offers the most detailed modelling to date on how the ESPR could reshape textile products, it also underlines how some of the scenarios reveal critical gaps between theoretical potential and operational feasibility. A major area of concern arises from the scarcity of data highlighted within the study. The ESPR’s ambition relies on granular data about durability, fibre composition, chemical substances, production processes, recycled content, and end‑of‑life pathways. However, available information is often fragmented, inconsistent, or simply lacking. This creates tension, as the scenarios modelled are based on assumptions of data availability that do not reflect the way information is managed across the supply chain.
The third milestone report analysis focuses on three representative product categories: knitted products, denim products, and other nondenim woven products. For each category the JRC has measured the environmental impact in a base case which represent the average technology and processes for the product category on the market.
In the” Assessment of the design options” section, the report proposes 4 eco design requirements:
- Increased Robustness (D01)
- Recyclability (D02)
- Recycled Content (D03)
- Environmental Footprint Reduction (D04)
An interesting and debated point is the JRC's decision to evaluate robustness and recyclability using a 1-to-10 scoring system, which can also be utilized for product claims. The system is intended to function similarly to the EU Energy Label for appliances. While the implementation of this concept would be a major step forward in the transparency of product sustainability performance, the differing contexts make implementation significantly more challenging for textiles than it has been for appliances. This is particularly true for robustness, which is not the sole factor determining a garment's actual service life.
Have your say in the peer‑to‑peer discussion on these issues active in the Sustainable Business workspace and Certification and Communication workspaces.
Comments (0)
Related content
See also
The JRC 3rd milestone - report on durability and robustness
- Categories
- Infrastructure Investments and funding R&I, techniques and technological solutions +16 more
The JRC 3rd milestone – Report on Repair And Repairability
- Categories
- Infrastructure Investments and funding R&I, techniques and technological solutions +16 more
Welcome to the 'Certification and Communication’ Community workspace
- Categories
- Infrastructure Investments and funding R&I, techniques and technological solutions +26 more
